home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Turnbull China Bikeride / Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso / BARNET / ARMLINUX / MAIL / 9707 / 000039_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Sat Jul 5 08:31:38 1997.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1997-11-30  |  3KB

  1. Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
  2. Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6]) by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.2/8.8.0) with ESMTP id IAA10769 for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 08:31:37 +0100
  3. Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 6962]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <2884-21425>; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 10:32:24 +0300
  4. Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <1004331-19315>; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 03:28:45 -0400
  5. Received: from sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk ([128.86.8.50] EHLO sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 2450]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <1004289-19315>; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 03:28:30 -0400
  6. Received: from bright.ecs.soton.ac.uk by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with JANET SMTP (PP); Sat, 5 Jul 1997 08:31:29 +0100
  7. Received: from  by bright.ecs.soton.ac.uk; Sat, 5 Jul 97 08:30:40 BST
  8. Received: from raistlin.armlinux.org by caramon.armlinux.org; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 23:13:18 GMT
  9. From: rmk92@ecs.soton.ac.uk
  10. Message-Id: <1077.199707042314@raistlin.armlinux.org>
  11. Subject: Re: ELF code
  12. To: charlese@cvs.com.au (Charles Esson)
  13. Date:     Sat, 5 Jul 1997 00:14:03 +0100 (BST)
  14. Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  15. In-Reply-To: <33BDE40B.30BCDA9E@cvs.com.au> from "Charles Esson" at Jul 5, 97 04:04:59 pm
  16. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
  17. Mime-Version: 1.0
  18. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
  19. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  20. X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  21. Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  22. Precedence: bulk
  23. Status: RO
  24.  
  25. Charles Esson writes:
  26. > I am looking into how hard it would be to do the ELF work for the ARM.
  27. > I,ve looked at the standard. The poor old ARM doesn't have a code under
  28. > e_machine.
  29. > Do you know where we would go to get one allocated.
  30.  
  31. Richard Earnshaw (@armltd) is at the moment working on this, and has strongly
  32. requested that we do not create our own standard since that will cause
  33. absolute havoc.
  34.  
  35. I will however, be in close contact with him, and I'd prefer it if we could
  36. all work with him to produce a fully functional ARM ELF standard and
  37. implementation.
  38.    _____
  39.   |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  40.   |   |       Russell King      rmk92@ecs.soton.ac.uk         --- ---
  41.   | | | | http://whirligig.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~rmk92/home.html  /  /  |
  42.   | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  43.   /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
  44.  /  | | |      *  who wishes that he was in Hong Kong  *      ---  |
  45.     +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |